Two Ways Leaders Get to the Top

Most people who’ve known me for a long while know that I’ve been driven to excel in almost everything I do.  Note, I didn’t say that I actually excel in everything I do; I said I’ve been driven to excel in almost everything I do.  As a young boy I took to heart my father’s advice:  “Anything worth doing is worth doing right.”

As I began the task of setting professional goals for myself, then creating specific plans to achieve those goals, I began to realize that my quest for goal achievement would inevitably intersect with others doing the same.  What then?

Two Ways Leaders Get to the Top

From my thirty-plus year study of leaders—good and bad—I’ve discovered there are multiple routes that can lead to personal leadership achievement.  The first approach may be hard for some to accept initially.  Frankly, it was for me.  While still young and naive, I found it hard to believe that individuals could actually rise through an organization and arrive at the top by intentionally, methodically climbing over others, holding others back and un-apologetically promoting themselves and their own personal agendas over others.  The very thought was distasteful to me on several levels.  Nevertheless, I found it to be true.  I came to know people in top leadership positions who prided themselves on their ability to “play the game” and to adroitly manipulate circumstances—and people—to achieve their personal goals with little or no regard for friend or foe.

Fortunately, I’ve also studied individuals who have taken a different route on their way to the top.  These thoughtful leaders never varied in their open commitment to support the efforts of their followers, encouraging, instructing, directing and praising these same followers at every turn.  The result?  Eventually, followers respond in such a way that propels their leaders to the top based on the team’s achievement of their collective goals.  What’s more, the leadership foundation is always firmer and more stable when the leader is lifted up by his or her followers than when he or she must continually strive to stay on top as others are praying for and plotting their ultimate fall.

“the leadership foundation is always firmer and more stable when the leader is lifted up by his or her followers than when he or she must continually strive to stay on top as others are praying for and plotting their ultimate fall”

As I describe in Chapter 7 of Leaders Ought to Know: 11 Ground Rules for Common Sense Leadership, when followers realize their leader is focused on what can be personally gained from the work relationship, followers become reluctant to accept or aid his or her lead. (Download a sample chapter now)

Yes, there are two distinct ways leaders get to the top — each with advantages and consequences. In your opinion, what’s the best leadership approach to the top? Feel free to share your insights here.

#gettothetop #goodleader #badleader

Additional Resources

Posted in

Phillip Van Hooser

Phillip Van Hooser, CSP, CPAE, Founder & Chair, Van Hooser Leadership. A seasoned leadership expert, keynote speaker, and author, Phillip Van Hooser is passionate about developing intentional leaders who can effectively engage and empower their employees to deliver powerful results. His most recent book is “Earning The Right To Be Heard," a primer for creating greater influence and opportunities. Connect with Phil on LinkedIn.

GROW YOUR
EMPLOYEES
INTO LEADERS

The
6 Levels of Empowerment

The 6 Levels of Empowerment

Increasing the leadership responsibility of your high-performers requires intentionality and insight. Understand each level you’ll need to move them through with this INFORMATIVE GUIDE.

The 6 Levels of Empowerment